The Atlantic’s August-issue cover story by staff writer Rose Horowitch “The Age of Reading Is Over” argues that humanity is heading into a post-literate era: one where the greatest number of people are capable of deciphering text, but where a shrinking share of us choose to read books when we have short form video, excerpts of longer texts, and other condensed forms of information (such as this newsletter) continually accessible. As a result, she argues, we’re losing our capacity for complex thoughts and critical thinking.
Rose Horowitch, in The Atlantic: “According to the National Endowment for the Arts, which conducts the most comprehensive survey of the nation’s reading habits, fewer than half of all adults reported having read a book of any kind in 2022. Only 38 percent read a novel or short story. A study analyzing 236,000 responses to the American Time Use Survey found that the proportion of Americans who read for pleasure on any given day fell from 28 percent in 2004 to 16 percent in 2023. (The study looked at people who had read a book, magazine, or newspaper; listened to an audiobook; or read an e-book.) Gambling has become a more common leisure activity than reading a book: Last year, 57 percent of Americans placed a bet.”
The numbers must be considerably lower still now, in 2026. The end of the literate era is upon us. It was nice while it lasted.
Rose Horowitch continues: “The books that people do read are simpler than they used to be. New York Times best sellers today have sentences that are about one-third shorter than they were a century ago. Longer sentences aren’t inherently better. But their former ubiquity suggests an age when Americans had the inclination and ability to read serious works of literature. In 1958, the English translation of Boris Pasternak’s Doctor Zhivago was the best-selling novel of the year, according to Publishers Weekly. Pasternak writes in long, complex sentences: ‘On that warm gray morning in the mountains, Zhivago felt sorry for the Tsar, was disturbed at the thought that such diffident reserve and shyness could be the essential characteristics of an oppressor, that a man so weak could imprison, hang, or pardon.’”






















